|
 |
|
FIGURE
I: Complete and Incomplete Axle Assemblies
|
A leading manufacturer of truck axles approached
Neff Press looking for a turnkey production solution.
The customer was looking for a better and more consistent
way to press wheel studs into rear axle shafts.
The shafts in question consisted of four different lengths,
had two different bolt circle diameters and required either six
or eight studs.
Previously, the customer employed "single-hit" tooling that pressed
all of the studs in one stroke of the ram.
While it was simple, this method proved problematic because
of tolerance variations on the head of the stud.
These variations prevented all of the studs from being pressed
flush into the axle. The resulting gaps between the stud head and
the axle created durability problems.
Neff's turnkey solution included a 25-ton C-frame
hydraulic press and the optional equipment detailed in Figure II.
 |
| FIGURE
II: Axle Assembly Press |
1.
Axle Length Sensor
2. Force vs. Distance Monitor Package
3. Safety Light Curtains and Swing-Away Guard Doors
4. Stud Hopper (500-stud capacity)
5. Common Upper Tool for Pressing Stud
6. Lower Tool Nest (Specific for 6 or 8 studs)
7. Servo-Driven Rotary Index Table
8. Manual Dovetail Slide - Adjusts for Bolt Circle Diameter
9. Neff DF25-15M Hydraulic Press |
Neff press designed all of the tooling for this
project. Each axle would be hand-loaded into a tool nest that had
clearance for the studs to stick through. The tool nest and axle
sat concentric to a rotary indexing table that would position one
stud at a time underneath the ram.
A key feature that allowed this project to be a
success was the servo-driven index unit (rotary table). The servo
unit can have variable numbers of stops and even complete complex
moves and rotate backwards if necessary. This allowed the customer's
6-stud and 8-stud axles to be completed on the same press. Additionally,
the indexing unit was mounted on a dovetail slide that allowed manual
adjustment for bolt-circle diameter via a hand crank and lead screw.
The main difference between the customer's old process and Neff's
new machine is the pressing cycle. Instead of pressing all of the
studs in one hit, the Neff machine presses one stud at a time and
then rotates the part the next stud under the ram. This process
would continue automatically until the operation is complete. This
method has a few distinct advantages. First, each stud head is pressed
in fully regardless of tolerance variations on head height. Second,
press size does not increase with an increased number of studs.
The size is optimized for the individual stud pressing operation.
This saves on the overall investment.
Because operators could mistakenly not load one or more studs into
the fixture, a method for detecting lack of a stud was necessary.
Using photoelectric or proximity sensors was not possible because
the tooling rotated 360 degrees and would facilitate a special switch
or slip ring coupling to run the signal through the center of the
indexing unit. Additionally, the insertion operation created metallic
chips that could fool a proximity or photo sensor.
 |
| FIGURE
III: Close-Up of Tooling and Fixtures |
1.
Hydraulic Ram
2. Completed Axle Assembly
3. Upper Pressing Tool and Ram Slide Assembly
4. Lower Tool Nest
5. Servo-Driven Rotary Turntable
6. Gib-Guidance for Pressing Tool |
Neff solved the problem using its Force-Vs-Distance measuring technology.
Knowing that each stud took a certain amount of force to insert,
Neff's press control used pressing tonnage and ram position feedback
to determine if a stud was actually present. If the required force
were achieved at a certain insertion distance, the machine would
continue on. If the required force was not achieved, an alarm would
be displayed and the operator would be prompted to load a stud.
 |
|
 |
| FIGURE
IV: Adjustable Indexer Slide |
|
FIGURE
V: Axle Assembly Before Pressing |
| |
|
|
 |
| FIGURE
VI: Force Vs. Distance Monitoring Screen |
|